Gaming Policy – Stabroek News

There are countries and cities that built their economies on gambling. Some believe there is no need to justify the decision, while others argue that it is an industry that generates income through taxes and tourism, provides employment and provides entertainment. Therefore, they consider gambling to be ethically neutral. Historically, gambling has been frowned upon in Guyana. It is based on religious values ​​accepted by people drawn from several religions, followed by many different ethnic communities. Opposition is strong across all religions, perhaps most strongly against Muslims.

It is against this background that Ram & McRae approaches the Gaming Policy developed and distributed by the Gaming Authority. This policy demonstrates the government’s intention to expand gambling across the country. Once enacted, the Gambling Authority will be authorized to issue over a dozen types of gambling licenses to operators throughout Guyana. These include Class A and Class B casino operator licenses. Slot parlor at Route Gaming Machines. electronic bingo halls; sports betting licenses and junket operators; One of the stated purposes of the policy is to provide visitors with adult girlfriend entertainment.

The policy indicates that the government has held discussions with key religious leaders, social workers, and the general public. This proposal expressly grants individuals of American Indian descent in designated hinterland areas the right to apply for licenses for electronic bingo halls to provide food/beverage services and live entertainment. , which claims to have been developed in line with the government’s long-term vision of diversifying the economic base and promoting employment.

Given the development path Guyana has embarked on, the inevitable question is why a country rich in natural resources identifies the gambling sector as a priority area for diversification. Guyana is not Macau, Nevada, Singapore, or the Bahamas.

Gambling can have adverse social and economic consequences. The potential for money laundering is very high and has been known to occur in casinos. But when you reach this newly proposed level, the possibilities are multiplied several times. Already our community suffers from low incomes that are exacerbated by gambling. Gambling is neither a social pastime nor a pastime. It is addictive and has been known to cause metal health and domestic problems, and even suicide.

It’s impossible to remove the downsides from gambling, but mitigation comes at a cost. Gambling establishments must be regulated by FIU and Gaming Authority officials, but it is left to the police to deal with the criminal consequences of gambling. And of course society will accept all negative social consequences.

Budget speech was silenced in this policy document, but one has to wonder if this is a joke.

This article was optimized by the SEO Team at Clickworks SEO

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *